<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Feed Mashup Editor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.fav.or.it/2007/12/feed-mashup-editor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.fav.or.it/2007/12/feed-mashup-editor/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 21:55:33 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pirsey</title>
		<link>http://blog.fav.or.it/2007/12/feed-mashup-editor/comment-page-1/#comment-1463</link>
		<dc:creator>Pirsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fav.or.it/2007/12/05/feed-mashup-editor/#comment-1463</guid>
		<description>If you ever want to see a reader&#039;s feedback :) , I rate this article for four from five. Detailed info, but I   have to go to that damn yahoo to find the missed parts. Thanks, anyway!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you ever want to see a reader&#8217;s feedback <img src='http://blog.fav.or.it/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  , I rate this article for four from five. Detailed info, but I   have to go to that damn yahoo to find the missed parts. Thanks, anyway!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zeno Davatz</title>
		<link>http://blog.fav.or.it/2007/12/feed-mashup-editor/comment-page-1/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Zeno Davatz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fav.or.it/2007/12/05/feed-mashup-editor/#comment-34</guid>
		<description>Hey

I would love to try out fav.or.it!

Any Beta-Invites left?

Thank you very much!

Best
Zeno</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey</p>
<p>I would love to try out fav.or.it!</p>
<p>Any Beta-Invites left?</p>
<p>Thank you very much!</p>
<p>Best<br />
Zeno</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arnout `raboof' Engelen</title>
		<link>http://blog.fav.or.it/2007/12/feed-mashup-editor/comment-page-1/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Arnout `raboof' Engelen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 10:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fav.or.it/2007/12/05/feed-mashup-editor/#comment-33</guid>
		<description>As for a better name: fav.or.ID? ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As for a better name: fav.or.ID? <img src='http://blog.fav.or.it/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The fav.or.it Blog &#187; Never get any duplicates</title>
		<link>http://blog.fav.or.it/2007/12/feed-mashup-editor/comment-page-1/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>The fav.or.it Blog &#187; Never get any duplicates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 23:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fav.or.it/2007/12/05/feed-mashup-editor/#comment-30</guid>
		<description>[...] we demonstrated recently you can very quickly share not just single items but whole &#8217;slices&#8217; of content with [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we demonstrated recently you can very quickly share not just single items but whole &#8217;slices&#8217; of content with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Halstead</title>
		<link>http://blog.fav.or.it/2007/12/feed-mashup-editor/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Halstead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 19:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fav.or.it/2007/12/05/feed-mashup-editor/#comment-31</guid>
		<description>John,

A slice can be a combination of many different things, so you can easily make a slice that is your feed (or feeds) but then filtered down to just a particular category/tag, and then that slice is available as a new feed or republished as a new site.

We are also working on what we call &#039;libraries&#039; which are collections of specific posts which would give you even finer granular control.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,</p>
<p>A slice can be a combination of many different things, so you can easily make a slice that is your feed (or feeds) but then filtered down to just a particular category/tag, and then that slice is available as a new feed or republished as a new site.</p>
<p>We are also working on what we call &#8216;libraries&#8217; which are collections of specific posts which would give you even finer granular control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Frost</title>
		<link>http://blog.fav.or.it/2007/12/feed-mashup-editor/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>John Frost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 18:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fav.or.it/2007/12/05/feed-mashup-editor/#comment-32</guid>
		<description>Just thinking about the one thing that would get me to switch from Google Reader, assuming you do the three things Scoble claims you can do. That would be to have one collection of feeds with the ability to publish to multiple &#039;shared links&#039; streams. I, like many people, contribute to many blogs/websites/social networking sites and would like to be able to tailor my feed slice to the different audiences at each different site I write for.

For instance, an article that appears in my RSS stream on Cooking at Walt Disney World might work in a shared links steam for both my food blog and The Disney Blog. Where a post on career hunting at Disney would work on my job search blog and The Disney Blog. But cooking wouldn&#039;t work so well on the job search blog and vica versa. So the ability to target a &#039;share&#039; is important.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just thinking about the one thing that would get me to switch from Google Reader, assuming you do the three things Scoble claims you can do. That would be to have one collection of feeds with the ability to publish to multiple &#8217;shared links&#8217; streams. I, like many people, contribute to many blogs/websites/social networking sites and would like to be able to tailor my feed slice to the different audiences at each different site I write for.</p>
<p>For instance, an article that appears in my RSS stream on Cooking at Walt Disney World might work in a shared links steam for both my food blog and The Disney Blog. Where a post on career hunting at Disney would work on my job search blog and The Disney Blog. But cooking wouldn&#8217;t work so well on the job search blog and vica versa. So the ability to target a &#8217;share&#8217; is important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
